Blog
Not every decision needs the same attention. Some choices are worth slowing down for, and some aren’t. Jeff Bezos is one of many entrepreneurs who do this well. He splits choices into two groups: those that are hard to undo and those that are easy to undo. The hard ones deserve careful thought, while the easy ones should move fast, and one person can usually decide them alone. That split is one of several concrete ways in which the habits of successful entrepreneurs cut the number of choices pulling at their attention each day.
Bezos first described this in a 2016 letter to Amazon shareholders. He called the hard-to-undo kind a one-way door, and the easy-to-undo kind a two-way door. Most decisions, he argued, are two-way doors and don’t need a heavy process.
Approaching these two kinds of decisions differently, instead of giving every choice the same process, is the first habit worth borrowing.
This framework matters less for its terminology than for the permission it gives: stop over-processing reversible choices. Most people can swap a meeting time, an internal workflow, a trial price, or a software tool later, and the switch costs little. Treating any of them like a permanent commitment burns more attention than the choice deserves.
Another habit removes a different kind of choice before it starts. Steve Jobs wore the same black turtleneck and jeans for decades. He said the choice was partly about convenience, and partly about creating a recognizable look for Apple’s public face.
Either way, a default settles the choice once, so no one has to decide it twice. Deciding what to wear is one small part of a CEO’s morning routine, but Jobs settled it once and moved on.
A default pays off most clearly on choices that repeat with low stakes. A fixed breakfast, a standing gym slot, or a meeting-free block each morning removes small negotiations from the day before they start. None of this makes a morning rigid. It only clears those negotiations away from the choices that still need real thought.
Recurring transportation follows the same logic. A standing monthly transportation account covers every trip once a client sets it up. It holds preferences on file instead of requiring them again each time.
A third habit works on the inputs that create new choices in the first place. Arianna Huffington leaves her phone outside the bedroom every night. It isn’t only about sleep. It also means one less thing pulling at her attention before the next choice that matters.
Leaving a phone outside the bedroom, or turning off a notification during a meeting, clears space and adds nothing new to track.
Removing inputs matters because a simpler day is not only about making fewer choices. It is also about receiving fewer prompts to make them. Every notification creates the chance of another response, another interruption, or another decision about whether to ignore it.
The fourth habit moves decisions off a single desk entirely. Buffett spends five to six hours a day reading, by his own account. He leaves the operating decisions at each Berkshire Hathaway business to the managers running it, with little direction from headquarters. Berkshire says as much in its own owner’s manual.
That’s the trade: give up the small decisions, save the time for the big ones. The same trade shows up in any CEO daily routine that leans on delegation. Buffett protects hours for reading because thousands of smaller decisions never reach his desk at all.
Delegation helps only when the person closest to a problem also has the authority to solve it. When every decision still routes through the top, delegation adds a layer of approval instead of removing one.
Simplifying the day does not mean rushing every decision. The goal is to protect attention for choices that are hard to reverse, expensive to get wrong, or important to other people. Hiring, major investments, pricing changes with long-term consequences, and strategic commitments still deserve time.
The useful distinction is between repetition and importance. A decision can happen frequently and still not deserve fresh attention every time. Another may happen once and justify hours of thought. A sound routine tells the two apart before deciding how much thought a choice deserves.
Taken together, these four habits are less about productivity tricks and more about controlling where attention goes. Bezos reduces process around reversible decisions. Jobs uses defaults. Huffington removes unnecessary inputs. Buffett delegates operational choices. None of them eliminate decision-making. They reduce the number of low-value decisions competing with higher-value ones.
These same moves work as real executive time management tips, usable well outside the C-suite:
Share this: